« Art: October 2003 | Main | Art: December 2003 »

November 28, 2003

Art Brut

Click on each photograph to view the artist's biography and a sample of their work. Click here to view the entire collection.

Art Brut designates "works executed by persons unharmed by artistic culture, in which mimesis, in contrast to what happens in the case of intellectuals, has little or no part at all. Consequently, the authors draw their inspiration (themes, materials, the means of transposition, rhythm, different styles of writing, etc.) from their resources and not from the clichés of classical or fashionable art."

Jean Dubuffet

To Protect and Serve: The LAPD Archives

"An exhibition of rare black and white photographs from the Los Angeles Police Department archives."

November 26, 2003

Pulp and Fiction

Richie Fahey's amazing retro-pulp images look like incredibly realistic oils, but are actually hand-tinted and painted photographs. His James Bond paperback book covers are also stunning.

November 25, 2003

Rock 'Em, Sock 'Em Robot Artist

Eric Joyner's illustrations of Fine Art Tin Robots are very nifty indeed. Can you spot the not-so-cleverly concealed donuts?

via The Sneeze

November 14, 2003

Ivana Smooch

In 1985, John Lustig bought the rights to Charlton Comics back catalog of "First Kiss" for $400, then proceeded to "adjust" the dialogue to suit his own nefarious ends. The result is Last Kiss Comics, a hilarious piss-take on old romance titles.

November 8, 2003

Matt Stuart Shoots People

Matt Stuart is a photographer with a special knack for finding serendipitous arrangements between people, objects, and words. His photos are gently and lyrically funny. Unfortunately, his website is a nightmare of slow-loading Flashturbation.

(via b3ta)

Yield To Total Elation

Several years ago, I saw a remarkable exhibition at the San Francisco MOMA; it featured a collection of elaborately beautiful architectural drawings by one, Achilles G. Rizzoli.

Rizzoli was possessed by visions of a sort of utopian theme park called Y.T.T.E (Yield To Total Elation) that he created to celebrate peace, poetry, happiness, and even euthanasia. His intricately drafted illustrations are accompanied by exhaustive annotations, filled with elaborate puns, and punctuated with sly acronyms that he uses as a sort of semi-secret code through which he addresses his dreams and near-total lack of experience with the intricacies of real life (he slept in a cot at the foot of his mother's bed, and remained a virgin for his entire life).

His flights of fancy are gorgeous and gothic, and reflect to a great degree the inspiring style of the School of Beaux-Arts of which he was a graduate. His drawings have been collected in a gorgeous book called A.G. Rizzoli: Architect of Beautiful Visions that I personally own and highly recommend.

(This entry was inspired by Mister Haitch's wonderful post about the autistic savant, John Henry Pullen)

Cartoon Censorship

Here's an excellently offensive essay on cartoon racism that came to me by way of the Cartoonist. It got me thinking about how much cartoons have changed since I was a kid. For example, I saw most, if not all of these censored Loony Tunes while growing up in Los Angeles, only to watch them get hacked to bits and sanitized for modern-day sensibilities by jerks like Ted Turner.

The height of this insanity was reached when they started editing out everything that even remotely smacked of violence. For example, you'd see Wile E. Coyote run off of a cliff, but they'd edit out his fall and subsequent impact, but then you'd still see him walk away compressed into an accordion shape. Elmer Fudd would be shown with his wabbit-huntin' gun, but the shots were edited out, then you'd see him a frame or two later with his face blackened by gunpowder. Ludicrous! Even my children thought this was ridiculous, and when shown the original versions, they were quickly able to spot, identify, and decry the obvious racism and stereotypes. In addition, I've never met a single child who wasn't able to distinguish between cartoon violence and the real thing, nor have I met one who was tempted to emulate what they saw.

Happily, these sorts of things are cyclical, and the pendulum appears to be swinging back towards allowing cartoons to retain their original form albeit with a caveat inserted beforehand that they are being shown for their "historical value". Whatever, as long as they stopped the idiotic censorship.

Finally, you may be shocked and dismayed to discover that some of our favorite cartoons and children's shows have featured graphically explicit sex scenes involving doll fornication and sodomy between fuzzy puppets, that were cut by the censors, and rightly so, in my opinion. Definitely not safe for work and I present it here purely for its "historical value", doncha know.